Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Formulating Research Questions and Research Objectives

Formulating Research Questions and Research Objectives

Formulating Research Questions and Research Objectives

Qualitative Research on Language Teaching

Universitas Pattimura | Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris

🎯 Learning Outcomes

Setelah menyelesaikan sesi ini, mahasiswa diharapkan mampu:

  • Membedakan antara research problem, research question, dan research objective
  • Merumuskan research questions yang clear, focused, dan researchable
  • Mengembangkan primary dan secondary research questions
  • Menyelaraskan research questions dengan qualitative research design
  • Mengaplikasikan framework yang tepat (PEO, SPIDER) untuk qualitative research
  • Mengevaluasi kualitas research questions menggunakan kriteria yang sesuai

📚 Foundational Concepts

The Research Question Hierarchy

RESEARCH PROBLEM
(broad issue in the field)
RESEARCH PURPOSE
(what you aim to achieve)
PRIMARY RESEARCH QUESTION
(central inquiry)
SECONDARY RESEARCH QUESTIONS
(sub-inquiries)
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
(specific, measurable goals)
📌 Example from Indonesian EFL Context

Research Problem:

Indonesian EFL students demonstrate limited willingness to communicate (WTC) in English despite years of instruction, affecting their oral proficiency development.

Research Purpose:

To explore the factors influencing willingness to communicate among Indonesian university EFL learners in classroom settings.

Primary Research Question:

How do Indonesian university EFL learners experience and perceive factors that influence their willingness to communicate in English classroom interactions?

Secondary Research Questions:

  1. What individual factors (e.g., anxiety, self-confidence, motivation) do learners identify as affecting their WTC?
  2. How do classroom environmental factors shape learners' decisions to communicate in English?
  3. What role do cultural values and norms play in Indonesian students' WTC in EFL contexts?
  4. How do learners describe their strategies for managing communication apprehension?

Primary vs. Secondary Research Questions

Aspect Primary Research Question Secondary Research Questions
Focus Broad, addressing the core research problem Narrow, exploring specific aspects of the research problem
Purpose Defines the main objective of the research Aimed at exploring specific dimensions of the main topic
Scope Encompasses the overall research agenda Covers particular components or variables related to the primary question
Role in Study Guides the entire research design and methodology Supports the primary question by delving into subtopics or related themes
Number Typically one, central to the study Several (3-5), depending on the complexity of the research topic

✨ Characteristics of Quality Qualitative Research Questions

1. Exploratory & Open-Ended

✗ Poor Example

Do Indonesian EFL teachers use technology in their classrooms?

Problem: This is a Yes/No question that doesn't explore experiences or meanings.

✓ Good Example

How do Indonesian EFL teachers integrate technology into their pedagogical practices, and what meanings do they attach to this integration?

Strength: Open-ended, explores both practices and meanings.

2. Focused Yet Flexible

✗ Too Broad

What are teachers' experiences with education?

✗ Too Narrow

What did Teacher A say about Google Classroom on October 15, 2024?

✓ Appropriately Focused

How do novice EFL teachers in rural Indonesian secondary schools navigate the challenges of implementing communicative language teaching approaches?

3. Non-Directional

✗ Directional (implies outcome)

How does project-based learning improve students' speaking skills?

Problem: Assumes improvement will occur.

✓ Non-directional

How do students experience project-based learning in relation to their speaking skill development?

Strength: Neutral, allows for various experiences and outcomes.

4. Researchable

✗ Not Researchable

What is the best method to teach English grammar?

Problem: "Best" is subjective and context-dependent.

✓ Researchable

How do experienced Indonesian EFL teachers conceptualize and enact grammar instruction in communicative classrooms?

Strength: Focuses on practices and conceptualizations that can be observed and described.

💡 Key Principle: Good qualitative research questions invite exploration and discovery rather than seeking to prove or test predetermined hypotheses.

🔧 Frameworks for Formulating Research Questions

PEO FRAMEWORK

Most suitable for qualitative studies exploring experiences, perceptions, or relationships

P – Population

Who are you studying? (Define your participants/sample)

E – Exposure/Experience

What phenomenon, experience, or intervention are you investigating?

O – Outcome

What aspects are you exploring? (Perceptions, experiences, behaviors, processes)

📝 Template for PEO Questions

"Among [Population], how does [Exposure/Experience] influence/shape/affect [Outcome]?"

🎯 Applied Example: EFL Writing Anxiety Study

P: Indonesian undergraduate EFL students at UNPATTI

E: Experience of using AI chatbots (ChatGPT) for writing assistance

O: Writing anxiety levels and writing processes

Resulting Research Question:

"How do Indonesian undergraduate EFL students at UNPATTI experience the use of AI chatbots in relation to their writing anxiety and writing development processes?"

Secondary Questions:
  1. What perceptions do students hold about AI chatbot assistance in writing tasks?
  2. How do students describe changes in their writing anxiety when using AI tools?
  3. What strategies do students employ when integrating AI chatbot feedback into their writing?

SPIDER FRAMEWORK

Especially suited for qualitative and mixed-methods research, focusing on participant experiences or perceptions

S – Sample

Who or what is being studied? (Specific population and setting)

PI – Phenomenon of Interest

What is the central concept or phenomenon you're investigating?

D – Design

What qualitative approach will you use? (Case study, phenomenology, ethnography, etc.)

E – Evaluation

What is being examined/assessed? (Practices, perceptions, effectiveness, experiences)

R – Research Type

Qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods?

🎯 Applied Example: Critical Literacy in Multimodal Learning

S: Secondary school English teachers in Maluku

PI: Implementation of critical literacy pedagogy with multimodal texts

D: Multiple case study design

E: Pedagogical practices, challenges, and student engagement

R: Qualitative

Resulting Research Question:

"How do secondary school English teachers in Maluku implement critical literacy pedagogy through multimodal texts, and what challenges and affordances do they experience in engaging students critically with diverse text forms?"

⚠️ Important Note: While these frameworks are helpful guides, they should not constrain your thinking. Adapt them to fit the unique characteristics of your research context and questions. Indonesian EFL research often requires cultural and contextual considerations that may not fit neatly into predetermined frameworks.

🎭 Aligning with Qualitative Traditions

1. Phenomenological Questions

Focus: Lived experiences, meanings, essence of phenomena

Structure: "What are the lived experiences of [participants] regarding [phenomenon]?"

Example:

"What are the lived experiences of Indonesian pre-service EFL teachers during their teaching practicum in rural school settings?"

Secondary Questions:
  • How do pre-service teachers describe their initial encounters with rural classroom realities?
  • What meanings do they construct about their identities as future teachers?
  • How do they navigate cultural and linguistic diversity in their teaching contexts?

2. Case Study Questions

Focus: In-depth exploration of bounded system, "how" and "why" questions

Structure: "How does [phenomenon] manifest in [specific case/context]?"

Example:

"How does an experienced Indonesian EFL teacher enact differentiated instruction in a large, mixed-ability classroom at SMA Negeri 1 Ambon?"

Secondary Questions:
  • What instructional strategies does the teacher employ to address learner diversity?
  • How does the teacher make in-the-moment pedagogical decisions?
  • What contextual factors shape the teacher's differentiation practices?

3. Grounded Theory Questions

Focus: Social processes, theory generation, interactions

Structure: "What process do [participants] engage in when [doing something]?"

Example:

"What processes do Indonesian EFL learners engage in when developing their English speaking confidence through sustained classroom interactions?"

Secondary Questions:
  • What conditions facilitate or hinder confidence-building processes?
  • What strategies do learners employ at different stages of confidence development?
  • How do peer interactions shape this developmental process?

4. Ethnographic Questions

Focus: Cultural patterns, shared meanings, group behaviors

Structure: "What are the cultural practices/patterns of [group] regarding [phenomenon]?"

Example:

"What are the cultural practices and belief systems surrounding English language learning in a Maluku coastal community, and how do these shape children's language learning experiences?"

Secondary Questions:
  • How do community members conceptualize the role of English in their lives?
  • What language practices occur in different community spaces?
  • How do traditional values intersect with English language education?

🎯 From Research Questions to Research Objectives

Research objectives operationalize research questions into specific, actionable goals. They provide the concrete steps needed to answer your research questions.

Characteristics of Good Research Objectives

Specific

Clearly defined scope and focus

Measurable

Can assess completion and achievement

Achievable

Realistic within available resources

Relevant

Aligned with research questions

Time-bound

Can be completed within study timeframe

💡 Common Verbs for Qualitative Objectives:

To explore • To describe • To understand • To examine • To investigate • To interpret • To discover • To illuminate • To capture • To document

Complete Alignment Example

1
Research Problem

Despite policy emphasis on student-centered learning, many Indonesian EFL classrooms remain teacher-dominated, limiting opportunities for authentic communication.

2
Primary Research Question

How do Indonesian secondary school EFL teachers understand and implement student-centered pedagogy in their classroom practices?

3
Secondary Research Questions
  1. What conceptions do teachers hold about student-centered learning in EFL contexts?
  2. How do teachers navigate tensions between student-centered ideals and contextual constraints?
  3. What pedagogical strategies do teachers identify as effective for promoting student agency?
  4. How do teachers evaluate student learning in student-centered classrooms?
4
General Research Objective

To explore and describe how Indonesian secondary school EFL teachers conceptualize and enact student-centered pedagogy within their specific teaching contexts.

5
Specific Research Objectives
  1. To identify teachers' conceptualizations of student-centered learning and its relevance to Indonesian EFL contexts
  2. To examine the pedagogical strategies teachers employ to foster student-centeredness in their classrooms
  3. To explore the contextual factors (institutional, cultural, material) that shape teachers' implementation of student-centered approaches
  4. To understand how teachers assess and reflect upon the effectiveness of their student-centered practices
  5. To describe patterns of variation in student-centered practices across different school contexts in the study

🛠️ Workshop Activities

Activity 1: Question Quality Analysis (20 minutes)

Instructions: Evaluate the following research questions. Identify strengths and weaknesses, then revise as needed.

Question A

"Does cooperative learning work in Indonesian EFL classrooms?"

Analysis Guide:
  • Is it qualitative in nature?
  • Is it open-ended and exploratory?
  • Is it researchable?
  • Is it appropriately focused?
Your Suggested Revision:

[Write your improved version here]

Question B

"What are the experiences of students?"

Analysis Guide:
  • What is missing from this question?
  • How can it be more focused?
  • What specific population, phenomenon, and context need to be added?
Your Suggested Revision:

[Write your improved version here]

Question C

"How does the implementation of task-based language teaching fail in Indonesian secondary schools?"

Analysis Guide:
  • What assumption does this question make?
  • How can it be more neutral and open-ended?
  • Does it allow for positive findings?
Your Suggested Revision:

[Write your improved version here]

Activity 2: Framework Application (30 minutes)

Scenario: You are interested in studying how Indonesian EFL teachers who teach in remote areas maintain their professional development.
Tasks:
  1. Formulate one research question using the PEO framework

    P (Population): _______________________

    E (Exposure/Experience): _______________________

    O (Outcome): _______________________

    Research Question: _______________________

  2. Formulate one research question using the SPIDER framework

    S (Sample): _______________________

    PI (Phenomenon): _______________________

    D (Design): _______________________

    E (Evaluation): _______________________

    R (Research type): _______________________

    Research Question: _______________________

  3. Develop 3-4 secondary research questions
  4. Write 3 specific research objectives

📊 Assessment and Evaluation

Research Question Quality Rubric

Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Developing (2) Needs Work (1)
Clarity Question is crystal clear, with well-defined population, phenomenon, and context Question is clear with most elements defined Question is somewhat clear but lacks specification Question is vague or confusing
Qualitative Nature Fully exploratory, open-ended, and seeks understanding Mostly exploratory with minor directive elements Contains both qualitative and quantitative elements Primarily quantitative in nature
Researchability Clearly feasible with appropriate methods, participants, and resources Feasible with minor adjustments Questionable feasibility; significant challenges Not feasible within typical constraints
Significance Addresses clear gap, highly relevant, strong potential impact Addresses gap, relevant to field Limited significance or relevance No clear significance
Alignment Perfect alignment between primary, secondary questions and objectives Good alignment with minor inconsistencies Some misalignment between elements Poor alignment; disconnected elements

Common Pitfalls & Solutions

Pitfall Example Solution
Too Broad "What are teachers' experiences?" Specify population, context, phenomenon: "How do novice EFL teachers in Maluku experience classroom management challenges?"
Leading Question "How does technology improve learning?" Neutral phrasing: "How do students experience technology-enhanced learning?"
Multiple Questions "What are teachers' beliefs and practices and how do students respond?" Separate into primary and secondary questions
Quantitative Focus "To what extent does anxiety affect speaking?" Reframe qualitatively: "How do learners experience and manage anxiety in speaking tasks?"
📝 Homework Assignment

Objective: Apply the frameworks and principles learned to formulate research questions for your own potential qualitative research project.

Tasks:

  1. Context Description (150-200 words) - Describe the EFL teaching/learning context, explain your interest, and identify the research problem
  2. Primary Research Question - Formulate ONE clear, focused primary research question and indicate which framework you used
  3. Secondary Research Questions - Develop 3-5 secondary research questions that support the primary question
  4. Research Objectives - Write 1 general objective and 3-5 specific objectives
  5. Qualitative Design Rationale (100-150 words) - Identify which qualitative tradition is most appropriate and justify why
  6. Self-Evaluation - Use the evaluation checklist to assess your own questions and identify areas for improvement

Evaluation Criteria:

  • Quality of research questions: 40%
  • Appropriate framework application: 20%
  • Alignment between questions and objectives: 20%
  • Qualitative design appropriateness: 10%
  • Critical self-reflection: 10%
Submission Format: Microsoft Word document, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1.5 spacing. Due: One week from session date.

📖 Recommended Resources

Core Texts
  1. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  2. Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
  3. Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431-447.
Indonesian EFL Context
  1. Lengkanawati, N. S. (2017). Learner autonomy in the Indonesian EFL settings. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 222-231.
  2. Hadisantosa, N. (2010). Insights from Indonesian practitioners on needs in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 21(1), 1-16.
💡 Online Resources:
  • SAGE Research Methods: https://methods.sagepub.com/
  • TESOL Research Resources: https://www.tesol.org/advance-the-field/tesol-research
  • Qualitative Research Journal Network

💭 Closing Reflection

As we conclude this session, reflect on:

1. Personal Connection

  • What aspect of formulating research questions resonates most with your own research interests?
  • What challenges do you anticipate in developing your own questions?

2. Contextual Relevance

  • How do the frameworks discussed apply to Indonesian EFL research contexts?
  • What adaptations might be necessary?

3. Moving Forward

  • What is one concrete step you will take to develop your research questions?
  • What additional resources or support do you need?
Open Comments

Post a Comment for "Formulating Research Questions and Research Objectives"